Home » News » Celtic could learn a thing or two from Disney FC (Wrexham) when it comes to youth development…and having a forward thinking, progressive CEO

10 thoughts on “Celtic could learn a thing or two from Disney FC (Wrexham) when it comes to youth development…and having a forward thinking, progressive CEO

  1. I can not believe you are comparing Wrexham to Celtic in all things.
    Surely you know the development problems that al Scottish clubs have i.e. Clubs from the big five countries simply offer wages we can’t. Is only one of the problems
    You can not wait to disparage our club and execs. Why is that? Really. Why
    YOU obviously think you know the business better. Believe me you do not

    1. In all things? I am comparing their ambition when it comes to youth development, not much else. And the fact they have an ambitious CEO. A club of our stature should be doing better in this area, simple as, and we’re not. It has nothing to do with wages. Wrexham don’t pay big wages to the players in their academy. They put them on a scholarship and ensure they finish their education as well as developing them as footballers. Its got nothing to do with wages, or a team in the big five countries. They’ve just been promoted from the third tier of English football. They’re not in the EPL, and they’re not paying anyone EPL wages, so I fail to see your point?

  2. Surely an investment of around 3 million a season on youth development would pay long term.
    We are in a position cash wise where we could easily pay this investment.
    We waste more each transfer window on project signings along with wages, agent fees ect.
    This would also help the young kids in many areas of Scotland believe in a brighter future.
    The board need to wake up to what Celtic is all about and start investing in the future.

  3. I am talking about wages offered to those graduating from the development team eg
    Ben Doak, Rocco Vata, Ben Summers and so on. You are so quick to rubbish the club you claim to support.
    Well done to Wrexham for what they are doing. There is no need to use them to rubbish Celtic the club you claim to support.

    1. I’m not rubbishing the club I support Weebarra, I’m rubbishing the people in our hierarchy who refuse to move with the times. Your point makes no sense, Ben Doak, Rocco Vata and Ben Summers left the club because they saw no pathway to the first team. They weren’t necessarily offered huge wages by the teams they went to in England, but they were better than the paltry sums they were offered by Celtic. Daniel Cummings and his family were insulted by what he was offered by Celtic. Don’t tell me with what we have sitting in the bank we couldn’t reward these guys properly for working so hard to get to the first team? In fact, its a proven fact that we’re paying millions to HMRC that we could be using to invest in youth. If a kid comes to Celtic and works hard to break through, do you then think its fair that he is offered a derisory wage in return for what he’s done? Why wouldn’t these players then choose to go down south, even if the wages aren’t massive? Its still better than what Celtic is insulting them with.

  4. Well I guess that is it then. Cummings was insulted by what the club offered.
    In deed.
    This is how it goes with the anti Board mob. We should just give the wage he wants if it will keep him at Celtic and if the other club wanted 1 more million for the player why not give it.
    We did give Norwich what they wanted for Idah but the same folks are irate now because they think they now paid too much. A club is not run that way by just giving what the other guy wants.
    As for a Pathway ( relatively new term ) for players moving on from the developmental part of the game I would suggest that is a problem for most clubs in Scotland but Celtic do try to work with the younger guys to keep them on track through loans etc. Not Celtics fault there is no decent leagues to continue player development. Maybe you could enlighten us as to what a decent pathway would look like.
    Cheers Eric

    1. Not playing in the Lowland league and instead allowing the young players to go out on loan to clubs in the Scottish Championship or League one, where they can develop in a professional environment and not an amateur one. And if you love the board WeeBarra, you’re entitled to that opinion. I don’t, they’ve stagnated and run out of ideas to take the club forward. Most clubs change their CEOs and chairmen every 5 years or so. We’ve been dealing with the same hierarchy since the turn of the century. Its stale and old now, and its time for change.

  5. What ambition has the board shown the last 20 odd years?? How many titles did we win then sell our best players from under the managers feet. We paid the price we did for idah because we fucked about too long and allowed Norwich to hold us to ransom. The manager should get a budget and it should be up to him to deliver success through signings.

  6. How many trophies have Celtic won in the last 20 odd years Antony ? is that successful or not.
    Whether we like it or not Celtic is a selling club. We do sell some of our better players it is all part of the plan. Why would you let a player run out his contract and then leave for free. Now that would be a culpable Board would it not.
    Re: Idah since Celtic do not tell anyone their business or transfer plans how would you know they feked about and then had to pay more for him.
    Were Celtic talking with other clubs or Agents about alternatives to Idah ?
    all of which would be time consuming and leading to a delay in signing the big man? We do not know but fek it lay it on the board anyway.

Comments are closed.