Something has changed at Celtic this summer.
I’m not talking about the speed of the transfer business. We’re still capable of turning a relatively straightforward negotiation into something resembling a UN peace summit.
Nor am I suggesting that three encouraging signings suddenly wipe the slate clean after years of frustration.
My memory isn’t that short and my eyes remain firmly on the Board.
What has changed, though, is the type of footballer Celtic appear willing to spend serious money on.
Kasper Høgh.
Camilo Durán.
And now, barring a late catastrophe of the sort you can never entirely rule out with Celtic transfers, Haissem Hassan.
Look at those players and compare them with so much of the recruitment we’ve watched in recent years. There’s a significant difference.
These aren’t punts being brought in primarily because somebody has calculated what they might be worth three years from now.
They are footballers being signed because they can make Celtic better NOW.
For me, Martin O’Neill is at the heart of that change.
Celtic haven’t abandoned the model — they’ve finally been told how to understand it better.
For years, whenever Celtic’s transfer strategy has been criticised, the argument has usually been presented as though there are only two possible options.
Either Celtic sign young projects with enormous potential resale value, or they chuck the model in the bin and start filling the squad with 30-year-olds on massive contracts who will eventually leave for nothing.
It was always a false choice. There is an enormous middle ground.
A club in Celtic’s financial position can buy a 23, 24 or 25-year-old footballer who has already demonstrated that he can perform at a serious level.
You might have to pay £7million, £8million or £10million rather than £2million, but you’re reducing the footballing gamble.
Which is where the first priority should always be – the f**king football.
Crucially, you haven’t eliminated the potential profit either.
If Høgh and Duran score goals domestically and do damage in Europe like they have previously, what happens to their value?
It goes up.
Should Hassan arrive, establish himself and perform in the Champions League, what happens to the value of a player still in his mid-20s?
Exactly the same thing.
So Celtic aren’t actually abandoning their player trading model, they are finally showing some aggression and ambition with the fees forked out.
I am utterly convinced the fork was passed to them by Martin O’Neill the other week, whilst Ultimado played out behind the scenes.
Sunday was perhaps the clearest example imaginable.
Høgh didn’t simply score three goals against Kilmarnock. His entire performance demonstrated why spending more money on a footballer with a stronger CV can transform the players around him.
His movement was outstanding.
For the third goal in particular, watch what happens before the finish. Høgh initially makes his run centrally, reacts immediately when the ball goes wide and then creates the space he needs inside the penalty area.
The finish looks simple.
The work that creates it isn’t.
That’s what proper strikers do.
Suddenly Benjamin Nygren now has somebody making intelligent runs ahead of him. The attacking midfielders have a focal point. Crosses into the box have purpose.
Celtic created chances last season too. Plenty of them.
What we so often lacked was somebody whose entire game is built around turning those situations into goals.
The numbers don’t lie.
After years of debating whether various players might eventually become good enough for Celtic, it is refreshing watching somebody arrive who already looks as though he knows exactly what his job is.
There’s another important distinction with this group of signings.
Celtic are supposedly trying to become a Champions League club.
Not simply a club that occasionally reaches the competition. A club capable of competing once it gets there.
So why wouldn’t European performance form part of the recruitment criteria?
Høgh and Duran arrived having scored goals at Champions League level.
Hassan signs having been a regular starter in La Liga and catching the eye for Egypt against Argentina at the World Cup.
There’s evidence these signings present a greater chance of doing the business for Celtic.
That doesn’t guarantee success. No transfer does.
What it does is reduce the number of unknowns.
Celtic have spent far too many windows buying potential while simultaneously asking the manager to deliver immediate results.
Those two objectives don’t always comfortably co-exist.
Which brings us to Martin O’Neill.
I obviously don’t sit inside Celtic’s recruitment meetings, so I’m not going to pretend I know every conversation that’s taken place.
However, judging by the business Celtic are now attempting to conduct, I strongly suspect O’Neill has rejected a fair number of players this summer.
Why?
Because this doesn’t look like the recruitment strategy we’ve become accustomed to.
We’ve watched Celtic sign batches of relatively inexpensive prospects before. Bring four in, hope one develops, move the others around on loan and eventually quietly remove them from the wage bill.
O’Neill doesn’t have time for that.
His WFM (Win Football Matches) mantra applies to Europe as well as domestically.
At this stage of his career, he’s not here to spend two years developing somebody in the hope he might eventually become Celtic quality.
He needs players capable of contributing immediately.
That change of emphasis matters.
There also seemed to be a remarkable acceleration around the Høgh deal after speculation about O’Neill’s frustration with Celtic’s transfer business began circulating.
Can’t think why.
We’ve seen what happens when Celtic leave it too late.
This is also why I’m not suddenly handing out medals to the board for a few signings that have surprised us.
We’ve been here before.
People now look back at the summer Celtic signed Arne Engels and Adam Idah and describe it as a successful transfer window because of what those players subsequently contributed.
It misses an important part of the story.
They arrived late.
Celtic didn’t have Champions League qualifiers that summer. Had they done, those players wouldn’t have been available when they were needed most.
Ironically, we already had Group Stage football secured and therefore the riches that come with that as good as banked.
Yet still heels were dragged.
Idah had already demonstrated during his loan spell exactly what he could provide, yet Celtic still allowed negotiations to take forever.
Engels subsequently required time to settle before producing his strongest football.
Signing the correct footballers eventually isn’t the same thing as running an efficient recruitment operation.
Better players can make Celtic better AND make Celtic money
Ultimately, that’s the biggest lesson I hope somebody inside Celtic has finally learned.
Footballing ambition and financial prudence aren’t enemies.
Sign better footballers and you increase your chances of qualifying for the Champions League.
Compete better in Europe and you increase revenue.
Players performing against stronger opposition increase their individual market values.
For too long, Celtic have occasionally appeared obsessed with protecting the downside while failing to appreciate the enormous financial upside available from simply building a better football team.
Høgh, Durán and Hassan suggest a different approach.

=============================================
Use the following embed code to publish this image online:
More info: at https://smartframe.io/embedding-support/
Players entering or approaching their prime. Players with stronger CVs. Players who can contribute immediately while retaining enormous resale potential.
That is the market Celtic should be operating in far more regularly.
And if Martin O’Neill has had to bang a few fists on tables to make that point clear, good.
There remains plenty to criticise about this transfer window. The pace has again been unacceptable, Champions League preparation has again been unnecessarily compromised, and a handful of good deals won’t erase what came before.
But I’ll acknowledge improvement when I see it.
For once, Celtic appear to be spending money with the first question being –
“How much better does he make the team?”
Rather than:
“How much might we sell him for?”
Ironically, if they keep answering the first question correctly, the second one will take care of itself.
Keep Your Eyes On The Board.
In MON’s first time at Celtic he brought in Sutton, Lennon and Hartson. He persuaded Dermot Desmond to spend money then and as a result we reached the EUFA Cup final in 2003. Unfortunately we didn’t consolidate on that high and keep signing quality players. In fact, after the EUFA Cup run we posted a trading loss which certainly surprised me.
The current upturn in quality signings is reminiscent of 2003 and hopefully we embark on a European run again. It might be expecting too much to do it in the Champions League but the latter stages of the EUFA League is definitely manageable. This is now a time for all Celtic supporters to fully enjoy our club and it’s players, urging them on to bigger and better things.
As we all know everybody wants Celtic FC to win …every game ! It’s possible to achieve but very very very unlikely and ultra difficult to attain . Not only that but time for new recruits to settle in and play the Celtic way is a short commodity …time is not an option . That’s where I believe Martin O’Neill excels over the rest as a top class coach ? He does give players time to adjust …but does so while the team is winning on the park and the guy learns how to win …fast ! A master trainer ! Whereas elsewhere in Glasgow the tribute act definitely do not give anyone time to settle in at Ibroxland whatsoever ….and are losing games in the process and so do not win titles and nobody learns as their ‘revolution ‘ gets re- introduced every season at huge cost ? That’s just one massive difference having Martin O’Neill as boss of Celtic as opposed to theRangers who sack their ‘ coaches ‘ faster than stadium steel arriving from China by order ! Martin O’Neill is a proven winner …over and over …his talent and intelligence for the game is limitless ! He’s not a ‘name ‘ who has never won a league title but whom the SMSM pin their hopes on every season ? Or a guy who wears brown brogues and flaps as he gets found out in the coaching department ? In Martin we trust …because he’s a multiple winning champion at his job ! You don’t arrive to be 74 years old and being a verified winner of titles multiple times and not collect a few tips and tricks of the trade along the journey …still ongoing . He’s the BOSS .
Great article, Bhoycie and thank you for taking the time to write it for us. Maybe the board now realize that the Almaty debacle cost the club 40 million – Maybe they also realize that young good players become even better players and that their transfer value increases with that. Maybe they now realize that spending fortunes on project players usually ends up with zero returns. We still need a few more proper players in this month.
Yes, I agree the quality of the signings are long overdue and I acknowledge that but I won’t be giving the board any plaudits for doing it’s job. We spent so much time lowballing and haggling with the backroom staff that MON had to step in and sort it out before they even began looking at recruitment. They need to go because when MON tenure is up in a years time (correct me if I am wrong he’s stated a year only) then we revert back to the old biscuit tin method. Let’s get these dinosaurs gone before that time. Only then may we see real ambition and progress.
I hope this is a change in direction from the board /desmond . Changing the model to more established players with a higher transfer value and selling them on at a higher price . From a few weeks ago when not many of us were particularly looking forward to the season to now dreaming again . Really looking forward now to a bit of style
Best article on here in a long time. Agree with everything stated.