Gordon Strachan has managed something quite remarkable. In attempting to address the growing divide between Celtic supporters and the club’s hierarchy, he has directed his lecture towards the very people who have spent years demanding meaningful dialogue.
And somehow, Dermot Desmond emerges without the scrutiny he deserves.
I find that extraordinary.
Strachan’s suggestion that both parties should come together might sound sensible in isolation. But it ignores the fundamental imbalance of power at Celtic.
One side has been asking questions for years. The other has the authority to provide answers.
Celtic Fans Do Not Need Another Lecture
What exactly does Strachan believe supporters have been doing all this time?
Celtic fans have repeatedly demanded transparency, accountability and proper engagement from those controlling their club.
They want answers about recruitment, ambition, governance and the direction Celtic are taking.
These are not unreasonable demands. They are the expectations of supporters who invest their money, time and emotion into Celtic.
Yet Strachan’s intervention appears to place responsibility equally on both sides.
That is not leadership. It is a spectacular failure to recognise where the real problem lies.
Why Won’t Strachan Challenge Dermot Desmond?
Here is what troubles me most.
Strachan appears perfectly comfortable telling supporters how they should behave.
But where is the equally forceful message for Dermot Desmond?
Where is the demand that Celtic’s principal shareholder engage directly with those who have been pleading to be heard?
Desmond possesses enormous influence at Celtic. He has the ability to initiate meaningful discussions and help restore trust.
Supporters cannot compel him to do so.
Surely Strachan understands that distinction?
Instead, his intervention risks giving the impression that the supporters are somehow responsible for a breakdown they have repeatedly tried to resolve.
Too Close to the Celtic Establishment?
Strachan’s association with Celtic makes his reluctance to challenge Desmond particularly troubling.
It raises a legitimate question about whether proximity to the club’s hierarchy has affected his perspective.
That is not an accusation of improper influence. It is a question about judgment and independence.
Because when someone with Strachan’s experience overlooks such an obvious imbalance, supporters are entitled to wonder why.
Celtic Deserve Better Than This
Nobody disputes that repairing relationships requires communication.
But communication must begin with a genuine willingness from those in power to listen.
Celtic supporters have already made their desire for dialogue abundantly clear.
They do not need Gordon Strachan telling them what they have been demanding for years.
They need Dermot Desmond to respond.
And until Strachan is prepared to direct the same scrutiny towards the Celtic hierarchy, his lectures about unity will ring painfully hollow.