GLASGOW, SCOTLAND - MAY 23: (L-R) Shaun Maloney, Assistant Manager of Celtic, Martin O'Neill, Interim Manager of Celtic, and Mark Fotheringham, Assistant Coach of Celtic celebrate with the Scottish Gas Scottish Cup Trophy after the Scottish Gas Scottish Cup Final match between Celtic and Dunfermline at Hampden Park on May 23, 2026 in Glasgow, Scotland. (Photo by Ian MacNicol/Getty Images)
The more things change at Celtic, the more they seem to stay exactly the same.
Cost-cutting.
ambitionless
So short-sighted that Michael Nicholson should be booking the boardroom a group appointment at Specsavers.
As yet again the people running the club seem more interested in finding another way to shave a few pounds off the wage bill.
Another Project Signing We Don’t Need
The latest name linked with Celtic is Elias Filet, with reports suggesting the club have opened talks with his representatives and are favourites to win the race for the striker.
Maybe he turns out to be a player.
Maybe he becomes a success.
But let’s be honest about what this looks like.

A striker from the Swiss second tier.
Another project.
And after years of mixed recruitment, we have every right to be sceptical… again
Another player who needs developing and who might become something.
The comparison that immediately springs to mind for me is Vakoun Issouf Bayo.
A player recruited as Moussa Dembele’s replacement.
And tragically failed.
That doesn’t mean Filet will follow the same path.
But it does raise a familiar question.
Why does Celtic always seem determined to shop at the bargain bin first?
At some point we are entitled to ask for proven quality instead of another long-term project.
Especially during one of the biggest rebuilds in modern club history.
Rewarding Success With Wage Cuts?
Then comes the second story.

And somehow it’s even more frustrating.
Reports suggest Shaun Maloney and Mark Fotheringham have been offered reduced terms despite helping drag Celtic over the finish line last season.
If true, it is difficult to understand the logic.
These were two coaches who arrived during a difficult period.
Two coaches who helped steady the ship.
Two coaches who played a role in delivering success when the club desperately needed it.
And the reward?
A pay cut.
Seriously?
If anything, they should be receiving recognition for their contribution.
Not being asked to accept less.
The Spreadsheet Mentality
The deeper concern is what these stories say about the people running the club.
Everything increasingly feels driven by spreadsheets.
Budgets.
Margins.
Cost savings.
Financial reports.
Nobody is arguing that Celtic shouldn’t be run responsibly.
Of course they should.
But football clubs are built by people.
Managers.
Players.
Coaches.
Supporters.
Not spreadsheets.
Sometimes it feels like the board becomes so focused on balancing numbers that they forget the human side of success.
Maloney and Fotheringham aren’t lines on an accounting document.
They’re people who helped rescue a difficult season.
The Wrong Message at the Wrong Time
This summer should have been about ambition.
A new era.

A major rebuild.
A statement that Celtic are serious about improving in Europe.
Instead we’re discussing another developmental striker from the Swiss second tier and reports of wage cuts for successful coaches.
Maybe both stories prove to be more complicated than they currently appear.
Hopefully they do.
Because right now, the message being sent is not one of ambition.
It’s one of penny-pinching.
Key Takeaways
- Celtic seems stuck in a cycle of cost-cutting and ambitionless recruitment, focusing on low-cost project players like Elias Filet.
- Fans expect proven quality as the club prepares for Champions League football, instead of relying on untested talents.
- Reports of wage cuts for successful coaches Shaun Maloney and Mark Fotheringham send the wrong message about rewarding achievement.
- The current approach suggests a spreadsheet mentality prioritising financial savings over the human aspect of football.
- Overall, Celtic supporters deserve a more ambitious direction, especially during a crucial rebuilding phase.
Are these claims factual or just more click bait. Either way if the board were more transparent with their ambitions it would ease fan concerns and stop all the nonsense rumours
When I first heard this I was absolutely outraged, but the more I think about it the more I think that it couldn’t possibly be true. Surely even this board couldn’t be this stupid and shortsighted? Surely Martin wouldn’t allow this to happen?
If as likely DD has RobbieK on standby as Plan B for 27/28, assuming MON doesn’t take up his option of a second year, then it’s highly unlikely that the current bunch of bean counters will sanction serious transfer moves in the here and now if Robbie Keane will come in expecting a serious budget allocation for that year.
The sound of a Swiss division 2 Striker in the changing room might be one of many similar deals that MON didn’t ask for.
If O`Neill doesn`t put his foot down now he will regret it half-way through the season and do a Rodgers.
I can see Nancy being invited back again.
You save your bosses from getting the sack so those bosses cut your wages.
1. They are jealous that you are successful and they are abject failures so they want to reassert their power.
2. In a boardroom culture where failing is constantly rewarded, success must be punished.
Good people get banned.
Saving money is No 1.
Ambition stops at the Scottish border.
The board make it harder for the team and manager to win anything.
Top managers get driven out.
Success gets punished.
Failure gets rewarded.
I don’t know what the hell that is but it isn’t the Celtic I know or want.