GLASGOW, SCOTLAND - SEPTEMBER 20: Celtic manager Martin O'Neill looks on during the William Hill Premiership 2026/27 match between Celtic and Glasgow Rangers at Celtic Park on September 20, 2026 in Glasgow, Scotland. (Photo by Ian MacNicol/Getty Images)
Martin O’Neill and Celtic’s board both owe supporters answers. O’Neill put his future in doubt after a handful of early-season games. The board then let the uncertainty hang over the club for more than a fortnight. Between them, they turned a manager’s decision into a public farce.
After Celtic’s defeat to Rangers on September 20, O’Neill said he needed time to reflect. Today he said it “didn’t take me that much time” to decide he wanted to stay. That makes the obvious question even harder to avoid: if his decision came quickly, why did supporters wait until October 6 to hear him explain it?
O’Neill cannot treat this job casually
O’Neill has earned respect for his past achievements. That does not give him a free pass now. Celtic is a full-time managerial job at one of football’s biggest clubs. The manager cannot leave supporters wondering whether he wants to carry on, then expect “I want to lead the club” to settle every concern.
If O’Neill cannot commit fully to the demands of the role, he should walk. The club needs a manager who is certain he wants the job and ready to lead the team every day. Today’s reassurance came after the uncertainty had already damaged confidence.
The board made the mess worse
The board’s failure is just as serious. Celtic appointed O’Neill on a one-year deal with an option for another year. It should have set clear expectations, communicated a decision timetable and prepared for the possibility he might step aside.
Michael Nicholson did express support for O’Neill in the annual-report remarks after the defeats. But that did not tell supporters when a decision had been made, what the manager’s role required or what would happen if he left. Celtic cannot present a line in a financial report as a complete answer to a major question about who is leading the team.
The contrast with the board’s response to the St Andrews protest is glaring. Celtic issued a lengthy statement, said it would “cease all engagement” with the Celtic Fans Collective and warned of indefinite bans. The board found a clear voice when condemning supporters. On the manager’s future, fans were left to wait and speculate.
Celtic needs answers, not another statement
O’Neill said the defeats were “not the end of the world”. The season is not over, but three straight losses demanded action and clarity. Rumours about his travel or working arrangements are not proof that he is part-time. Celtic must explain his day-to-day commitment plainly.
The manager and board both own this mess. If O’Neill cannot give Celtic the full-time commitment this job demands, he should leave. If he can, the board must explain why it took so long to say so and show supporters it has a credible plan. Celtic should not be run on uncertainty and guesswork.
He is just the boards puppet on a string