Michael Nicholson has emerged from the shadows once again.
Or from behind the sofa.
Not for an open interview, don’t be daft.
Not to answer supporters’ concerns directly.
Not to front up at a time when Celtic fans are desperate for reassurance over the club’s transfer business.
Instead, we’re left reading minutes from the Association of Irish Celtic Supporters Clubs AGM from days ago.
And if those minutes were supposed to reassure supporters, they’ve done the absolute opposite.
The first thing that jumped out at me was Nicholson’s claim that Celtic face difficulties competing with Premier League clubs and even Championship sides when trying to sign players.
Honestly… what market is he talking about?
Because I genuinely can’t remember the last time Celtic were consistently going toe-to-toe with established Premier League clubs for transfer targets.
No fan with half a brain cell expects us to either!
For well over a decade, we’ve largely operated in different markets altogether.
So where is this bullsh*t coming from?
Is it an attempt to soften expectations before a ball has even been kicked in the transfer window, or does the CEO genuinely believe that’s the market Celtic are competing in?
It’s incompetence and delusion all rolled in to one innit?
Then came the line that made me laugh the most.
According to Nicholson, the easiest players to sign are those who are out of contract.
Really?
Let’s talk about Kelechi Iheanacho.

A player who was already through the door. A player who knew the club, knew the dressing room, knew the city and contributed massively when called upon.
A beyond easy out of contract player, Michael.
By his own logic, that should have been one of the simplest deals Celtic had to complete.
Yet here we are.
The reality is there doesn’t seem to be such a thing as an “easy signing” under Michael Nicholson.
Martin O’Neill then revealed he had told the board that Celtic are in major need of signings because the current squad isn’t strong enough to compete.
Fair enough.
But haven’t we heard this before?
It sounds remarkably similar to the concerns being voiced in January.
It was obvious then.
It’s obvious now.
Acknowledging there’s a problem is one thing.
Actually fixing it is another.
Then we arrive at the familiar line about identifying young talent and developing players.
Nobody is against developing young footballers.
In fact, Celtic should be one of the best clubs in Europe at doing exactly that.
But development has to produce results.
Watching Dane Murray recently certainly didn’t leave me thinking Lennoxtown is producing the next generation of elite first-team players.
He still looks a long way off Celtic level.
Yet he’s continually been afforded opportunities while others, such as Maik Nawrocki, have barely been given a chance despite many supporters believing he’s currently the stronger option.
The part that irritated me most, though, was Nicholson’s suggestion that younger players are more likely to “take the gamble” by moving to Glasgow.
Since when did playing for Celtic become a gamble?
This is one of the biggest football clubs anywhere in Europe.
Champions League football.
Sixty thousand supporters every other week.
A fanbase unlike almost any other.
What sort of message is he sending here when referring to players coming to us as a gamble? Is this really how this clown sells Celtic to prospective new signings?
Glasgow itself is a city that countless former players have spoken warmly about long after leaving.
Why is the club’s own chief executive framing Celtic as though players are taking some enormous personal risk by moving here?
Playing for Celtic isn’t a gamble.
It’s a privilege. Ask Joe Hart for example.
Finally, Nicholson suggested younger players aren’t swayed as much by wages.
That may well be true.
But it raises another question entirely.
Does Celtic’s wage structure actually reflect the ambitions of a club that wants to establish itself as a regular Champions League competitor?
Or are we still operating with a salary model that belongs to another era?
Supporters understand recruitment isn’t easy.
Nobody expects Celtic to outspend Premier League clubs.
What they do expect is leadership, confidence from the top and some f**king ambition.
Most of all, they expect a chief executive who speaks about Celtic like it’s a destination footballers should be desperate to reach—not somewhere they’re taking a gamble on.
That angered me so much reading that.
If anything, they reinforced the growing feeling that the club’s messaging has become a series of explanations for why things are difficult, rather than a blueprint for how Celtic intend to overcome those difficulties.
It should get easier to navigate these Windows, with the experience gained from each one.
Mick and his cronies are simply out of their depth when it comes to the Transfer Windows in Summer and January.
We are getting worse at them to be honest.
And that’s the part supporters should find most concerning.
Keep Your Eyes on The Board.
Kelechi signed a contract last season with a years option… This was agreed by all sides otherwise he would not have signed or played last season. The BOARD decided NOT to activate the option … Now they are scrambling around trying to resign him … He has wasted valuable time, that everyone knew he needed, because THEY not HIM decided against triggering the option. Please make it make sense !