Home » News » Is Jota’s Celtic return being fast-tracked due to Michael Nicholson’s inability to work at pace in the transfer market?

7 thoughts on “Is Jota’s Celtic return being fast-tracked due to Michael Nicholson’s inability to work at pace in the transfer market?

  1. Signing quality players for big fees takes time….

    Would you rather have the Ibrox approach and sign up the dross they have added!!

    Only Daizen was contributing out of the players who have left!!

    Although I can’t stand the board,it is churlish not to acknowledge that the quality of players targeted has went up several notches to MON satisfaction yet we still have countless blogs from the trinity tits saying he’s walking out etc.

    Fat boys article on Celtic failing duty of care for MON should ensure he is never part of the fan media recognised by the club ever again.

    1. Give your opinion, much of which I disagree with but that’s your right. No need for the abuse, it takes away from your points.

    2. The quality of the 2 players we’ve signed, as opposed to the 6 more we need you mean?.
      Hurrah, we replaced a player 18 months after we first needed the replacement. No wonder we get no where trying to hold these people to account, too many fawning sycophants, in spite of you denial/qualifier, which are meaningless.

      Ps as John says you can leave out the personal attacks when you comment.

  2. It’s not abusive when they have written it in black and white so maybe you should have a read.

    It’s Celtic and Martin who are being abused.

    Check out the article that calls Martin a lame duck.

  3. I hope the medical people and coaches are cautious and don’t buckle under the boards pressure because of their failings .keep it up Eric as you and ur ilk are shining a light on celtic board . If there was no pressure applied we’d have been given a lot of loans and unready Celtics b team players

  4. Any writer expressing opinion piece has a responsibility to provide evidence. While presenting ‘evidence’ in the form of reference to a pattern of past conduct might have some credibility, it is not a concrete base upon which to present serious argument. Even although the reputation of Celtic’s Board is at best questionable, and generally unacceptable beyond doubt, it does not provide a legitimate springboard for linking Jota’s first steps on the training ground to the Board apparently influencing the players recovery programme.
    The Sports Science staff, and the coaching team, deserve to be presented as carefully managing Jota’s return to fitness. Puff pieces are exactly that, making little positive contribution to discussion. In this case, avoiding flimsy speculation, and enjoying the fact that one of our most influential players is now on the way back should be the welcome focus. It’s unnecessary and inappropriate to drag the Board into this topic, especially as there are many other areas of their performance which justify serious analysis and criticism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *